|
Click on any of the images below
to see a larger version of the image.
|
I pick up most of my surplus rifles from income
generated from after hours work. I usually come up with a
paid job, every month, that brings in side income enough to pick
up "a" something or two. I then name the new purchases (rifles)
after the job or person that paid me. I know this does not make
a lot of sense, but it helps me keep track of how I purchased what
and with what. This way I can explain to my wife how I have not
ruined our budget for the month. This month was no exception, I
was hired to test a new printer for a large printer manufacture
by a company named "Opinions", so when I peered down the barrel
of a SMLE No.1 Mk III and saw that it was in excellent shape, I
could not pass it up. If I do more than one job for a specific
employer - then I have a complex numbering system that appends to
the end of the name - just kidding - but there is always someone
that would ask. |
|
The
finish of Opinion's metal was arsenal refinished and the wood was
new. I am a collector, but not a collector for resale value. I find
myself extremely happy when I find a rifle in such good condition,
even (especially) if it has had a complete arsenal overhaul.
I found the barrel to be fairly new, if not completely new.
I had recently purchased another SMLE Mk III and it is definitely
not in this good of condition. The finish is almost completely warn
off and the barrel was in fair to good condition (after
a hell of a lot of cleaning!). The only redeeming quality of
my first SMLE was that the wood is beautiful (as shown in
figure 11). Out of all my rifles I don't have any Military
rifle stocks that hold a candle to this one. The first rifle is
rightly called "I am going to get in trouble for this one"
as I purchased it out of the households regular budget and made
the wife very unhappy.
|
The SMLE was very advanced in it's day, the early 1900s to late
1940s. Imagine a rifle being used in WW I with a detachable 10 round
magazine not unlike that of modern battle rifles (as shown in
figure 3). Although the rifle was designed to use
a detachable magazine it also was designed to take a stripper clip
and even single rounds.
|
|

The action on the No.1 is excellent and very fast. In most circles
it is well established that the SMLE has the fastest cycling
bolt action style action of all battle rifles, and I can see
why this is true. The .303 British is a pretty stout cartridge,
somewhere between the 30-40 Krag and the 30.06. I make this point
because the bolt and the bolt's locking lugs are noticeably smaller
in diameter or size than most bolt action rifles.
|
|
The sights on
the No.1 are some of the most well protected that I have ever seen.
Both the front and back sights have enormous "bunny" ears on either
side as shown in figures 5 and 13. Adjusting the sights
are easily accomplished by sliding the elevation up
and down the gradient. There is also a small micro adjustment on
the rear sight that I have not seen on any other stock surplus military
rifle, that I really like. You can adjust the rifle to a very granular
level by turning the "backsight, fine adjustment worm wheel"
one click, each click represents a change of only 5 yards!
|
|
I also really
like the look of the solid brass butt plate as shown in figure
6. All in All the No.1 is a very classy looking battle rifle.
|
I loaded my first 5 rounds into
the reconditioned No. 1, after setting up my target. After correcting
the elevation I started to shoot good groups. As you can see in
figure 7 both 5 round groups were "in the black" and pretty
tight. |
|
Next I loaded up the No.1
with the fair to good barrel (not expecting much).
I was very surprised as I could not see very much difference
in accuracy between the two rifles. Although the elevation was different
to achieve the same grouping, I found both rifles to be pretty darn
accurate. I am looking forward to picking up some brass and experimenting
with some loads. Maybe I will try one out at the Military Silhouette
Matches, soon.
|
 
|

Looking at the "butt sockets" of both rifles
in figures 9 and 10 you will see when, where, and who manufactured
the rifles. The older of the two rifles (the one I had
just purchased and was reconditioned) in figure 10 displays
the "Royal Cypher" (yes, correctly spelled), that it was
manufactured in 1918 by the Birmingham Small Arms Company (BSAC).
The rifle in figure 9 shows that is was manufactured in Lithgow
in 1941.
|

The safety and magazine release on the SMLE No.1
rifle are very unique.
Instead of a cocking piece style safety, there
is a lever on the left rear of the receiver that can be actuated
by pulling it to the rear and snapping/locking it down. If
you find the safety can be moved while set, by moving the bolt handle
- the screw retaining the safety lever is too loose and needs to
be tightened.
The magazine release is inside of the trigger
guard positioned to the front of the trigger. It can be quickly
and easily depressed to drop the magazine by pressing up on the
lever.
|

I have always admired the SMLE No.1s and 4s (since
I was a little kid and saw them both in all of the WWII war movies
that I watched). To say I was really pleased to happen
on two that perform this well is an understatement. I am now going
to be keeping my eye out for "a" (or two) good No.4 to add to my
collection and Surplusrifle.com's.
If you are interested in more information
about the SMLE rifles, you can find two good publications that I
will review later. The first is a book titled, British Firearms
- The Lee Enfield Number 1 Rifles, by Alan M. Petrillo. The
second book is an NRA publication titled, British Enfield Rifles.
Both books are excellent sources of Historical facts and "How To"
information.
|